Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-05-12 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2018-05-12 Senate Journal Page 3140 HB 280 HOUSE BILL NO. 280 "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Marital and Family Therapy; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. Senator Meyer, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Rules Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 3134. Senator Gardner objected, then withdrew her objection. There being no further objection, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 280(RLS) "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Marital and Family Therapy; relating to the State Medical Board; relating to the licensing of physicians, osteopaths, and podiatrists; relating to the practice of medicine; relating to the practice of podiatry; relating to the practice of osteopathy; and providing for an effective date" was adopted. Senator Micciche moved and asked unanimous consent the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 280(RLS) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 280(RLS) "An Act extending the termination date of the Board of Marital and Family Therapy; relating to the State Medical Board; relating to the licensing of physicians, osteopaths, and podiatrists; relating to the practice of medicine; relating to the practice of podiatry; relating to the practice of osteopathy; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS HB 280(RLS) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates YEAS: 19 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Begich, Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Egan, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Hughes, Kelly, MacKinnon, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Shower, Stevens, von Imhof, Wielechowski, Wilson Excused: Stedman 2018-05-12 Senate Journal Page 3141 and so, SENATE CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 280(RLS) passed the Senate. Senator Micciche moved and asked unanimous consent the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.